• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry Machine Learning Mauler 1/30-2/1

But it’s strange how most other modeling makes it work with both except for the NAMs. Something to keep a eye on I guess

Yea, I do feel like we’re kind of drifting back towards some of those big dog runs from Tuesday though if coastal keeps popping. Be cool if it could pop on the coast even 75 miles would help us a ton to get both ULL AND Coastal


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I’m more concerned the NAM is firing warning shots and losing some of the ULL and turning this more into a coastal.
NAM is on an island. Not sure if coastal & ULL type stuff is in its wheel house either. I respect the NAM more so with sniffing out a warm nose in an overrunning event. But if it shows it again mid morning, it’ll have my attention more. It’s going back & forth currently.
 
Looks like more of a shift or the dry a lot forming further west over my area. I guess this has always been a possibility, especially if we lose some of the ULL influence.
The biggest development I see is the surface low is now forming along the Gulf Stream where an incredible baroclinic zone resides between the Arctic air mass and the warm water there.
 
GFS AI figuring out Coastal, but it’s taking moisture from the West. It would suck if some how at the last day these two features figure out a way to NOT coexist. Gonna need this movement to stop next cycle. View attachment 191651

Hopefully it will work it’s out for you and us! I don’t want to steal from you brother


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Model consensus really seems to be honing in on 6-10” for mby. Every source except Brad P has us in that range including who I would consider the best forecaster I’ve seen, Eric Webb. Brad probably would have us somewhere similar but he’s terrified of the dry air intrusion, which is understandable.

As for the morning model runs, we wouldn’t be banking on the NAM if it was the only one showing what we wanted. No reason to do so in the other direction now.
 
55de0b5ad03c22f56c6b91545c586a5d.png

5d97c15225d60dc1fb46112d27d23e7f.png

CHS bumping there totals up…
 
I personally think we are fine. If other short term modeling head towards the NAM then I can understand the worry, but the NAM hasn’t been consistent at all, and it’s already been known to be lackluster QPF wise in the past, badly in some casesView attachment 191654View attachment 191655
Yeh man, but shifts like this scare the weather family on the Southern flank of this. I am sure it's got NC grinning. But anyways, I am to emotionally involved in this one for a rug pull so my negativity is oozing to the surface a bit. rrfs_a-nc-total_snow_kuchera-1769752800-1769925600-1769925600-20.gifrrfs_a-nc-total_snow_kuchera-1769752800-1769925600-1769925600-20.gif
 
I personally think we are fine. If other short term modeling head towards the NAM then I can understand the worry, but the NAM hasn’t been consistent at all, and it’s already been known to be lackluster QPF wise in the past, badly in some casesView attachment 191654View attachment 191655

I completely agree I think you guys are still in a good spot I do like how the models have gotten the coastal more involved in order to get the Triangle firmly in the game


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
There's still so much uncrtainty around Raleigh, it's crazy. Still not sure how the qpf is going to evolve up there. The euro was great for them, but seems suspicious with the dry slot along the NC tidewater area.

00z Hrrr was a tad more dry that i'd like for my area, but otherwise was a great run for pretty much everybody, I'd cash that in right now for sure.

I think we can safely ignore the NAM products for now, they're on an island.
 
Back
Top