• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry January 23rd-27th 2026

My personal opinion is this has the makings of the Jan 2022 storm all over again. Not from an H5 standpoint but from a surface level. We were looking at a massive sleet and ZR Storm. Then we got FGEN WAA front end snow that way overperformed and held on for much longer than anticipated. I feel like that’s going to have a great chance to happen here too. Obviously you can’t nail those details down until 12-36 hours out. I wouldn’t be shocked to see the 85 north crew really over perform on snow before the eventual switch to sleet. The surface level cold is equivalent to that Jan 2022 storm too. We snowed or sleeted in the low to mid 20’s then.
 
Comparison here of the AIFS vs. EPS at the MOT (the Moment of Truth!) when the wave is in the desert southwest.

As the height lines show, the EPS has the more west-to-east southern slider look out front. There is more "activity" / vort energy diving down thru W Canada on the east side of the tall western ridge on the AIFS and the tropospheric polar vortex (TPV) in E Canada has moved farther east. The baja wave has kicked out farther east too as wow mentioned....all leading to a more north solution on the AIFS

Jan 19 MOT.gif
 
My personal opinion is this has the makings of the Jan 2022 storm all over again. Not from an H5 standpoint but from a surface level. We were looking at a massive sleet and ZR Storm. Then we got FGEN WAA front end snow that way overperformed and held on for much longer than anticipated. I feel like that’s going to have a great chance to happen here too. Obviously you can’t nail those details down until 12-36 hours out. I wouldn’t be shocked to see the 85 north crew really over perform on snow before the eventual switch to sleet. The surface level cold is equivalent to that Jan 2022 storm too. We snowed or sleeted in the low to mid 20’s then.

Another over performer where the snow held on much longer than expected.
 
Comparison here of the AIFS vs. EPS at the MOT (the Moment of Truth!) when the wave is in the desert southwest.

As the height lines show, the EPS has the more west-to-east southern slider look out front. There is more "activity" / vort energy diving down thru W Canada on the east side of the tall western ridge on the AIFS and the tropospheric polar vortex (TPV) in E Canada has moved farther east. The baja wave has kicked out farther east too as wow mentioned....all leading to a more north solution on the AIFS

View attachment 185558
Was looking at that...with the west coast ridge being modeled to rise up by all globals...was thinking AI might be more right. But that's just a guess...


ecmwf-aifs-ensemble-avg-nhemi-z500_anom-1768802400-1769126400-1769536800-20-1.gif
 
Would not surprise me to see the AIFS suddenly snap back to a less progressive baja low and look like the Euro Ensemble mean. The PV will trend slower and park that HP over us. The baja lows rarely come out in one piece with this setup.
An astute observation, considering how it snapped to the progressive solution in one run and is already slow walking it back...

21d4d4c1-a061-456f-821c-6b2c65f98b69.gif
 
An astute observation, considering how it snapped to the progressive solution in one run and is already slow walking it back...

View attachment 185564
bouncy discussed yesterday here how the 'snap' jumps/moves with AI are a feature to correct initial errors better than the traditional model systems
 
WeatherNext 2.0 was run back to 2022-01-01, so we can take a peek at the forecast evolution leading up to 2022-01-16. It was remarkably locked in 120 hours out.

I would like to think these archived runs use initial conditions that are the same as what the ECMWF would have had at the time, but I don't know that for certain.

Edit - if this belongs in another thread, someone please let me know. Don't want to clutter, and I'm not around here enough to know y'alls preferences.

1768832981744.gif
 
It has been a long time since a potential storm five days out has grabbed my attention like this. Thanks to everyone for helping me understand the setup with your comments and observations.

If I am correct - and I’d greatly appreciate guidance if not, because I’m constantly learning - models historically struggle with depth/reach of CAD.

Being in the far northern ATL burbs, I’m very closely watching this one. Makes me thankful I spent time this summer cutting down some dead trees and limbs around my house.

Good day to check our batteries and flashlights, and price additional battery packs and other items … just in case.

—30—
Chainsaws. Make sure your neighborhood has chainsaws. I've got 6 now since living thru Atl in 73. I'm never without a working saw and fresh chains. Only had to learn that lesson the one time.
 
Trying to find analogs for this pattern is really tough because of how unusual it is to see this level of cold line up with this strong of a southern stream.

Found a null case from mid-December 1963 that looked similar pattern-wise, but this was way more suppressed than this will be because we have a stronger SW US trough & SE ridge here which will shift things well to the NW into this brutally cold air mass

1768833959652.png


1768834111758.png
 
Comparison here of the AIFS vs. EPS at the MOT (the Moment of Truth!) when the wave is in the desert southwest.

As the height lines show, the EPS has the more west-to-east southern slider look out front. There is more "activity" / vort energy diving down thru W Canada on the east side of the tall western ridge on the AIFS and the tropospheric polar vortex (TPV) in E Canada has moved farther east. The baja wave has kicked out farther east too as wow mentioned....all leading to a more north solution on the AIFS

View attachment 185558
The 06z AI resembles the 00Z Ukmet.
However, the EURO ensembles have trended slower/stronger the past 4 runs. Really still seems like a battle line being drawn with AI vs traditional modeling. The traditional modeling have been picking up on wedging better than the AI so far.
 
Chainsaws. Make sure your neighborhood has chainsaws. I've got 6 now since living thru Atl in 73. I'm never without a working saw and fresh chains. Only had to learn that lesson the one time.
Yes. Key word being working. The time to fix a gunked up carb and cracked fuel lines on your grandpas homelite chainsaw is not during a storm. It’s well before.
 
I know right now the models are showing us getting an ice storm but we are still 4 to 5 days away for models to get a better handle on this potential winter storm. Yes a lot can change from now until then so i say let’s just enjoy the weather because it’s the only weather we got
We are around five days away and the energy that will trigger this storm has not been sampled yet. You are correct that a lot can change during the upcoming time period but the strong signal the models are showing for a major winter storm for the Southeast can't be ignored and will probably verify. The details are what will have to be figured out and fine tuned during the next 120 hours. I am going to start making plans in case this turns into a freezing rain fest for KRDU. I will have to check our generator and the chain saw when I get the chance and start preparing like this event is going to be a repeat of December 2002 when my area got socked with around .75 inches of freezing rain.
 
If we keep this look for another 24 hours, I can’t see there not be a devastating ZR storm in the Sandhills and PeeDee with life endangering cold afterward. You think you were cold in 2002 when the lights went out then? This makes 2002 look like child’s play in comparison.
 
I think you are spot on here. I wouldn’t be surprised if we go SN to IP to ZR in lulls and then doing it all in reverse.
I agree, usually Miller Bs here end up with a lot of mixed slop and rain. However, this is such a cold air mass, we may see very little in terms of rain and a lot of transition from snow to ice and back to snow again, especially in NC.
 
Snow maps get a bad rap, as they should but the AI Euro never was enthused for snow in the southeast for yesterday. Atleast on SV...one of the few that didn't. Another + for the AI Euro.

It showed some light snow as it got closer to yesterday and I believe areas to the NW of RDU got some light snow.

946b76c7-d0a5-4b5b-b1cb-63be90a50f3d.gif
 
If I remember correctly in the Charlotte area don't we usually have a dry slot when we have a setup like this and the low transfers to the coast?
There is variance. Miller B Dec 2002 didn’t have any problem with precip, but yes, some Miller B’s struggle. Miller A/B Jan 2010 had decent precip but not as much as expected
 
If I remember correctly in the Charlotte area don't we usually have a dry slot when we have a setup like this and the low transfers to the coast?
That happens quite frequently with Miller B systems and a dry slot could be a saving grace for areas that happen to be under it during a potential ice storm of this magnitude.
 
Would not surprise me to see the AIFS suddenly snap back to a less progressive baja low and look like the Euro Ensemble mean. The PV will trend slower and park that HP over us. The baja lows rarely come out in one piece with this setup.
generally i agree with this, but i need to know more about the aifs first. i haven't had enough beers with it
Snow maps get a bad rap, as they should but the AI Euro never was enthused for snow in the southeast for yesterday. Atleast on SV...one of the few that didn't. Another + for the AI Euro.

It showed some light snow as it got closer to yesterday and I believe areas to the NW of RDU got some light snow.

View attachment 185581
as another data point, it played out almost exactly as expected in richmond. rain flipped to snow around 3 pm. got a dusting that's still around. it was really pretty
 
Back
Top