• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry Winter 25-26 Winter Battle Zone

The image below is how it looked for Jan 2022 at this time, when instead of one of the coldest week 3-4 outlooks on record for the SE half of the US like was the case for Jan of 2025, it was suggesting that a mild SE half of the US was a much better possibility. This is when there was a similar very strong -PNA to what’s being forecasted for late Dec:
View attachment 179308

How did Jan 8-21, 2022 verify in Greensboro, NC? They ended up 4 BELOW normal and had two 1”+ snowfalls. So, one would have had no clue from NOAA even as late as Dec 24th of 2021 that a cold and snowy Jan of 2022 in much of the E US was incoming. The point is that sometimes the extended models don’t have a clue.
I guess the snow and cold skipped Atlanta because Atlanta had normal temps and only 1/2” of snow in January 2022.
 
I could see the Aleutian ridge finally getting dislodged eastward and/or poleward in mid January or so.

We just need another injection of westerly momentum to give things a kick. A fast-moving mjo could get the job done to shift the pacific jet equatorward and extend it.

We need an uptick in west pac convection to help us break this tropical +AAMa vs -EAMT stalemate that’s locked the Aleutian ridge in place, and we are almost certainly not getting help from the EAMT
 
We also need to keep pushing the warm pool east as much as we can unless you all want to also torch in February like we normally do in La Niña

Because thus far, we still have not gotten off the La Nina script in a low frequency sense
 
I guess the snow and cold skipped Atlanta because Atlanta had normal temps and only 1/2” of snow in January 2022.

Yes, ATL was NN. That’s why I mentioned GSO. Like GSO, GSP also had 4 BN during 1/8-21 (dates for that weeks 3-4 outlook) along with 6.5” of snow. This is why I said that one would have had no clue from NOAA even as late as Dec 24th of 2021 that a cold and snowy Jan of 2022 in much of the E US (though not very cold like 2025) was incoming. Baltimore was similar, etc.

IMG_6272.png
 
Last edited:
Today’s Euro Weeklies are similar to the prior ones through Jan 11th with mild for much of the country though the warmest is closer to the C US, well away from the E US.

However, today’s weeks 4-5 continue yesterday’s cooling trend. And week 6 is mainly NN in the E US.

In summary, whereas the first 3 weeks (through 1/11) remain mild in much of the E US, the last 3 weeks (1/12-2/1) are mainly NN to a little BN in most of the E US as a +PNA tries to develop. So, there’s nothing remotely warm in the means in the SE for mid to late Jan. And this of course opens the door to even colder than NN as we get there, which is more in line with my thinking at this point.

+PNA trying to form for the week 1/19-25
IMG_6282.png
 
Last edited:
Today’s Euro Weeklies are similar to the prior ones through Jan 11th with mild for much of the country though the warmest is closer to the C US, well away from the E US.

However, today’s weeks 4-5 continue yesterday’s cooling trend. And week 6 is mainly NN in the E US.

In summary, whereas the first 3 weeks (through 1/11) remain mild in much of the E US, the last 3 weeks (1/12-2/1) are mainly NN to a little BN in most of the E US as a +PNA tries to develop. So, there’s nothing remotely warm in the means in the SE for mid to late Jan. And this of course opens the door to even colder than NN as we get there, which is more in line with my thinking at this point.

+PNA trying to form for the week 1/19-25
View attachment 179324
Sure that will get pushed back even further as time Rolls closer. Hate be that guy
 
The sooner we completely abandon La Nina, the better off we’re going to be late winter/after MLK Day.

Some hints of the upper level footprint from La Nina just completely collapsing on the weeklies near the end of January into February
I know you know your stuff, but I’ll never believe it can snow in February again until I see it with my own two eyes. Therefore if we are punting most of Jan then it’s over in my eyes.
 
I know you know your stuff, but I’ll never believe it can snow in February again until I see it with my own two eyes. Therefore if we are punting most of Jan then it’s over in my eyes.

A lot of this is internally driven/random to a certain degree. We will regress back to the mean at some pt
 
Random I realize, but was looking over the winter of 96 for here in Northeast Tennessee and typed in February.

February of 1996 was absolutely insane.

14” of snow that month mainly from one storm early in the month, followed by a low of -15, followed by a record high of 79° later in the month.
 

Attachments

  • 3305E350-AF2F-4F0B-999A-74627ACB277F.jpeg
    3305E350-AF2F-4F0B-999A-74627ACB277F.jpeg
    721.2 KB · Views: 17
Random I realize, but was looking over the winter of 96 for here in Northeast Tennessee and typed in February.

February of 1996 was absolutely insane.

14” of snow that month mainly from one storm early in the month, followed by a low of -15, followed by a record high of 79° later in the month.

Lol it was crazy here too. Earliest 90 on record after -11Screenshot_20251220-022814.Chrome.png

I was still in Alabama then but I think that's the year we were so cold the lakes were icy and I remember running out of snow days at school lol. I can still recall them talking about us going on Saturday at one point(I believe some days were lost due to Hurricane Opal before the winter which was a disaster inland). I mean we were almost 200 miles inland and had 90 mph winds probably
 
Last edited:
Looking at strong -WPO Decembers since 1950 for a -ENSO (that’s in Dec and continues through JF per RONI):

I count 10 strong -WPO Decembers during -ENSO winters. Here’s how the subsequent WPO ended up for JF averaged out:

2013-14: -WPO

2010-11: -WPO

2005-6: +WPO

1995-6: -WPO

1983-4: neutral WPO

1964-5: neutral WPO

1962-3: -WPO

1961-2: -WPO

1956-7: -WPO

1955-6: -WPO


So, the tally for the JF avg is 7 -WPO, 2 neutral WPO, and 1 +WPO. So, these 10 strong -WPO Decembers during -ENSO decently favored -WPO for the average of JF fwiw. Both are favored to be -WPO but Jan is the most strongly favored for that.

Out of these 10, 7 Jans had BN temps in the SE. The ones that didn’t were 1965 (NN), 2006 (AN), and 1957 (AN). But Feb leaned AN, which isn’t surprising with -ENSO.
 
Last edited:
Looking at strong -WPO Decembers since 1950 for a -ENSO (that’s in Dec and continues through JF per RONI):

I count 10 strong -WPO Decembers during -ENSO winters. Here’s how the subsequent WPO ended up for JF averaged out:

2013-14: -WPO

2010-11: -WPO

2005-6: +WPO

1995-6: -WPO

1983-4: neutral WPO

1964-5: neutral WPO

1962-3: -WPO

1961-2: -WPO

1956-7: -WPO

1955-6: -WPO


So, the tally for the JF avg is 7 -WPO, 2 neutral WPO, and 1 +WPO. So, these 10 strong -WPO Decembers during -ENSO decently favored -WPO for the average of JF fwiw. Both are favored to be -WPO but Jan is the most strongly favored for that.

Out of these 10, 7 Jans had BN temps in the SE. The ones that didn’t were 1965 (NN), 2006 (AN), and 1957 (AN). But Feb leaned AN, which isn’t surprising with -ENSO.

Note that all of those years were immediately followed by El Niño.
 
It would be nice if this year decided to go off the La Nina script at some point later on this winter, because people will not like the result in February if we don’t

Ever since October, we have deviated very little in general from it

October
IMG_7003.jpeg

IMG_7002.jpeg


November
IMG_7005.png

IMG_7004.gif


December
IMG_6619.jpeg

IMG_7001.gif

January. We will probably have more troughing than the weeklies show in January

IMG_7007.jpeg

IMG_7008.png

February last 30 years Nina composite 🚮 🤢

IMG_6997.jpeg
 
We’ve been discussing that the models have been too warm in the E US in week 2 quite often since Thanksgiving week. Well, here are some maps clearly showing that for all 3 major ensembles that has been the case averaged out over the last 90 days even more than I realized: this is crazy, especially when one realizes this goes back to Oct and even late Sept, when misses are typically smaller due to typically lower variance. So, this implies that if there were a 30 day map that the misses might be even larger.

EPS last 90 days: 2.5-4F too warm SE:
IMG_6434.png

GEFS last 90 days: 2-4.5F too warm SE:
IMG_6432.png

GEPS last 90 days: 1.5-2F too warm SE: This is more significant than it sounds because the CMC is cold biased/coldest model on avg. That’s why it hasn’t been as far off. So, if even the cold biased GEPS has been too warm, that’s saying a lot!

IMG_6433.png


@Webberweather53
 
Last edited:
I just looked up -ENSO winters with a -PNA in Dec to see how often it went to a +PNA in Jan. In what winters did this occur?

-1954-5: -0.52 to +0.40

-1962-3: -0.08 to +0.58

-1983-4: -0.31 to +0.97

-1984-5: -1.60 to +1.63

-1996-7: -1.23 to +0.63

-1998-9: -0.09 to +0.16

-2008-9: -1.41 to +0.61

-2010-11: -1.78 to +1.29

-2012-3: -1.01 to +0.55

-2013-4: -0.86 to +0.97

-2016-7: -0.35 to +0.28

-2021-2: -2.56 to +1.01

-2022-3: -0.66 to +0.22

So, although it wasn’t common from 1954-5 through 1971-2, when only 2 of 9 (22%) switched, here’s something that just blew my mind:

-ALL 11 -ENSO -PNA Decs since 1983-4 switched to +PNA Jans (listed above)!

-These 11 averaged +0.76 in January!

-Now, check out the -ENSO Jan PNAs since 1983-4 that had a +PNA in Dec:

1) 1985-6 went from +1.39 to +0.97

2) 1988-9 went from +0.63 to -0.72

3) 1995-6 went from +0.92 to -0.02

4) 1999-00 went from +0.21 to -0.82

5) 2000-01 went from +1.23 to +1.51

6) 2001-2 went from +0.56 to -0.04

7) 2005-6 went from +1.38 to -0.43

8) 2007-8 went from +0.14 to -0.32

9) 2011-2 went from +0.36 to +0.60

10) 2017-8 went from +0.89 to +0.40

11) 2020-1 went from +1.58 to +0.19

12) 2024-5 went from +1.70 to +1.05

-So, for these 12 -ENSO Decs since 1983-4 with a +PNA, only 50% also had a +PNA in Jan.

-So, since 1983-4, whereas only 50% of the 12 -ENSO Decs with a +PNA also had a Jan +PNA, 100% of the 11 -ENSO Decs with a -PNA in Dec went to a +PNA in Jan! Thus, having a -PNA in Dec during -ENSO since 1983-4 has, if anything, meant a big increase in the chance for a +PNA in Jan whether random or not! I didn’t know this til just now.


Link to monthly PNA table:

I’m bumping this 11/16/25 post.

So, following the strong -PNA of Dec of ‘25 (-1.41), Jan ‘26 as expected came in with a +PNA (+0.79). So, this now makes it 12 -ENSO -PNA Decembers in a row, which dates all of the way back to 1983-4, that transitioned to a +PNA Jan:

 
I’m bumping this 11/16/25 post.

So, following the strong -PNA of Dec of ‘25 (-1.41), Jan ‘26 as expected came in with a +PNA (+0.79). So, this now makes it 12 -ENSO -PNA Decembers in a row, which dates all of the way back to 1983-4, that transitioned to a +PNA Jan:

I wish we had another 300 years of readings to work in. I've been watching a variety of shows on history, lectures on various peoples in various lands.... and they all mention the ups and downs in avg temps over time, and the impacts on events. With more years would probably be more patterns. Like that recent clown map from Goofy. I'd love to know what the input was to get that result. What did the computers see that gave middle Ga two feet, and more toward Atlanta, and 40 inches in NC. Surely once in 500 years, maybe a thousand that happened, and I'd love to see a write up on it. But, alas, we have what we've got, but even that produces patterns. Good work. Patterns are important.
 
I wish we had another 300 years of readings to work in. I've been watching a variety of shows on history, lectures on various peoples in various lands.... and they all mention the ups and downs in avg temps over time, and the impacts on events. With more years would probably be more patterns. Like that recent clown map from Goofy. I'd love to know what the input was to get that result. What did the computers see that gave middle Ga two feet, and more toward Atlanta, and 40 inches in NC. Surely once in 500 years, maybe a thousand that happened, and I'd love to see a write up on it. But, alas, we have what we've got, but even that produces patterns. Good work. Patterns are important.
This brings up a very good point. We have such a small sampling of record weather statistics. Most of what we know about weather history is recorded records from around 1880 and on. Prior to that we often have to rely on newspaper clippings, if you can find them, personal journals that mostly get lost over time, and sometimes we just have to rely on oral history that gets passed down through generations. The fact you’ll see a computer model spit a solution like the GFS did a few days ago, leads me to believe that back in history, some time over that last several hundred years, a storm like that occurred.
 
Jan 15th-Feb 4th, 2026 goes down as one of the most historic winter periods in modern records in the SE US and won’t soon be forgotten:

Among top 10 coldest "Jan. 15 - Feb. 4" three-week periods on record for much of the East

In FL-VA, this goes down as the top 3-10 coldest in most locations accompanied by well above avg wintry precip many areas, including the deep SE.

Dominant indices Jan 15-Feb 4:
- moderate to strong +PNA
- strong to very strong -AO
- moderate to very strong -EPO
- moderate to strong -WPO
- so one of the greatest 3 week long combos of +PNA, -AO, -EPO, -WPO on record
- strong to moderate MJO phases 6-7 and weak phase 8
- neutral NAO averaged out with no strong anomalies



 
Last edited:
This brings up a very good point. We have such a small sampling of record weather statistics. Most of what we know about weather history is recorded records from around 1880 and on. Prior to that we often have to rely on newspaper clippings, if you can find them, personal journals that mostly get lost over time, and sometimes we just have to rely on oral history that gets passed down through generations. The fact you’ll see a computer model spit a solution like the GFS did a few days ago, leads me to believe that back in history, some time over that last several hundred years, a storm like that occurred.
They are collating ships logs from all around the world, that give conditions over time, and that will be a wonderful source of data. They were asking that people donate time on their computer to the project.
  • Old Weather Project: Volunteers and scientists transcribe historical U.S. Navy and Royal Navy logbooks, particularly from the 19th and early 20th centuries, to fill in gaps in historical weather records, especially in remote areas like the Arctic.
  • Whaling Logs & Climate Science: Researchers analyze 19th-century American whaling logs, which provide unique, consistent data from remote ocean areas often not covered by trade vessels. These logs help scientists understand changes in high-pressure systems and wind patterns (e.g., the "Roaring 40s" turning into "Furious 50s" in the Southern Ocean).
  • Digitization Efforts: Projects in the UK and US have imaged thousands of Royal Navy logs (1750–1850) and WWII-era US Navy logs to create digital datasets, such as the International Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set (ICOADS).
  • Data Types Extracted: Key data extracted include wind speed and direction, barometric pressure, air/water temperature, and sea ice conditions, which are often recorded in four-hour watch blocks.
 
Back
Top