• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Misc 2022-23 Fall/Winter Whamby Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rain Cold said:
Something to do with a cylinder. That was after the tyranny fell out and had to be repaired. That car was a disaster
Click to expand...
Damn wtf lol. Not much has changed either lol these mustangs nowadays still have lots of issues. I almost got a ecoboost Mustang instead of the veloster.
 
tazaroo said:
I've been seeing on here since yesterday that all the pieces are moving in our favor and were getting great trends for a possible 27/28 storm. Then when I look at the surface, the moisture looks to be moving further offsure and or drying up on the Ensembles.

What gives.
Click to expand...
Excellent question!

You see, what had happened was, there's a lot of energy flying around. And we need to know what happens with the first storm before the models can get a handle on the second storm.

Now that all that's out of the way, you got the pieces on the board, but they have been a long, long way away from producing a storm close to the area. Now we are just a long way away. Plus, I wouldn't focus too much on the 7 day model precip placement. Just need to see steps forward upstairs. We didn't make a ton of progress in that regard today.
 
Myfrotho704_ said:
Damn wtf lol. Not much has changed either lol these mustangs nowadays still have lots of issues. I almost got a ecoboost Mustang instead of the veloster.
Click to expand...
The 80s mustangs were so cheap. I still wouldn't buy one. I would get a Civic SI tho....or one of those Type Rs.
 
Rain Cold said:
The 80s mustangs were so cheap. I still wouldn't buy one. I would get a Civic SI tho....or one of those Type Rs.
Click to expand...
Those type Rs are sexy man, these new inline 4s with a turbo make some impressive power… over 300 horsepower on a 4 cylinder stock is pretty insane. Car has the power of a Subaru WRX but way more reliability, and looks a little better
 
Myfrotho704_ said:
Those type Rs are sexy man, these new inline 4s with a turbo make some impressive power… over 300 horsepower on a 4 cylinder stock is pretty insane. Car has the power of a Subaru WRX but way more reliability, and looks a little better
Click to expand...
I had a 2002 WRX. I think that was the first year of those? Then I had a kid and sold it and got a CRV lol. It was a super fun car to drive...but it did have a noticeable turbo lag, though.
 
Rain Cold said:
I had a 2002 WRX. I think that was the first year of those? Then I had a kid and sold it and got a CRV lol. It was a super fun car to drive...but it did have a noticeable turbo lag, though.
Click to expand...
WRXs are very fun, and powerful for a 4 banger, but man there motors can blow so easy, but people dont allow break in times with subies, especially new, of after bolt ons/tuning, so the motor just blows. Was the turbo spool on your wrx audible ?
 
Myfrotho704_ said:
WRXs are very fun, and powerful for a 4 banger, but man there motors can blow so easy, but people dont allow break in times with subies, especially new, of after bolt ons/tuning, so the motor just blows. Was the turbo spool on your wrx audible ?
Click to expand...
Yeah it was. Also, I drove it easy for the first whatever thousand miles. I never had any mechanical issues with it other than some clutch shutter in the last year I had it.
 
Rain Cold said:
I had a 2002 WRX. I think that was the first year of those? Then I had a kid and sold it and got a CRV lol. It was a super fun car to drive...but it did have a noticeable turbo lag, though.
Click to expand...
WRX crew represent! Yeah, even my model (a 2020) has some turbo lag. But otherwise pretty perfect for the price (and it has four doors, which is nice for practicality).
 
superjames1992 said:
WRX crew represent! Yeah, even my model (a 2020) has some turbo lag. But otherwise pretty perfect for the price (and it has four doors, which is nice for practicality).
Click to expand...
Nice! I've wondered if the BRZ would be fun to drive. Don't know anybody who has one though.
 
Rain Cold said:
Excellent question!

You see, what had happened was, there's a lot of energy flying around. And we need to know what happens with the first storm before the models can get a handle on the second storm.

Now that all that's out of the way, you got the pieces on the board, but they have been a long, long way away from producing a storm close to the area. Now we are just a long way away. Plus, I wouldn't focus too much on the 7 day model precip placement. Just need to see steps forward upstairs. We didn't make a ton of progress in that regard today.
Click to expand...
1671682767120.gif
 
I have a new rule that the NW trend only applies when there is some snow on the models if there are two that have something for at least two model cycles. That has yet to happen, so we will see.
 
Ollie Williams said:
I have a new rule that the NW trend only applies when there is some snow on the models if there are two that have something for at least two model cycles. That has yet to happen, so we will see.
Click to expand...
My theory is it only happens when it takes us out of the game, not when we actually need it. ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top