Blue_Ridge_Escarpment
Member
Hope everyone gets in on at least some wintry action!
Idk man not trying to be Debbie downer on snow but it's hard to find much evidence for snow in NC. Waa in the mid levels is probably going to be stout with the H85 and H7 flows with such a southerly component. I think the better hope for many is the models are underestimating the depth and intensity of the cold push in the sfc to 925 layer and there is more sleet. I could be wrong especially if we are seeing the models as usual being late on the precip arrivalDamn we’re still trending to more confluence and GL ridging ?! Keep doing that and that introduces a quick front end snow potential for the NC Piedmont View attachment 57209
Even the nam is doing the same in the LR with stronger confluence >>> better GL ridging and better CAD, gonna have a pants bursting run soon ?View attachment 57210
Idk man not trying to be Debbie downer on snow but it's hard to find much evidence for snow in NC. Waa in the mid levels is probably going to be stout with the H85 and H7 flows with such a southerly component. I think the better hope for many is the models are underestimating the depth and intensity of the cold push in the sfc to 925 layer and there is more sleet. I could be wrong especially if we are bc seeing the models as usual being late on the precip arrival
Hopefully sleet can start becoming dominant if we keep trending colderRealistically if you want snow in NC the better hope is more intense secondary cyclogenesis off of the coast farther south. This would help start stacking the sfc into the mid layers and veer the flow resulting in caa and the ptype changeovers moving toward the S and east. Unfortunately as modeled right now this is a classic ice storm
That's not a bad sounding at all. As we know the models often underestimate the intital fgen and upglide and are late on precip arrival. If we get one of those fingers of precip rolling in early it would certainly change things a little and maybe bring a little snow but it would also likely shift the freezing rain/sleet lines SE since it would lock in the CAD dome. This would likely keep the coastal trough at Bay since it would be bumping up against a deeper cold dense airmass and the coastal low farther eastI’m just saying for the very very front end part of it, the GFS tries to show a window with soundings that could wet bulb quickly, but yeah I agree at this point sleet is a win with this look, stronger CAD is just locking in freezing temps View attachment 57212
Gotta like the 925 low being weaker and farther west and the wind barbs being more east. If we can get more NNE this would be a major sleet eventHopefully sleet can start becoming dominant if we keep trending colder
View attachment 57213View attachment 57214
Ping city.Imagine if we trend colder here View attachment 57216
Yeah soundings do have that look near Lake norman NC for exampleAs I mentioned yesterday, I find it suspect that this is entirely a snow -> ZR changeover, with little room for sleet. These things most always never verify that way. I would expect, especially if there are colder trends, this to be mostly sleet.
View attachment 57218
We need one pretty big shift south with the confluence to press down on the ridge, otherwise yeah that’s uglyEuro is slowly moving toward lower height across the NE but it's also raising heights across the SE blahView attachment 57223
It’s increasing every run and inching south. These CAD situations always trend colder, stronger, and generally press into NE Georgia at least.I do see a bit of a trend in North Ga as well for onset ZR becoming possible. It's getting closer each run but I'm not too sure about the ridge strength only being a 1037.
1037 is very intense for a CAD high, getting close to rivaling Dec 2002 in terms of parent high intensityI do see a bit of a trend in North Ga as well for onset ZR becoming possible. It's getting closer each run but I'm not too sure about the ridge strength only being a 1037.
so how can I get this down to Columbia? ?1037 is very intense for a CAD high, getting close to rivaling Dec 2002 in terms of parent high intensity
You honestly probably don’t want any part of this lol. Having your power knocked out for several days to a week or more is no funso how can I get this down to Columbia? ?
i agree ive been there before and it sucksYou honestly probably don’t want any part of this lol. Having your power knocked out for several days to a week or more is no fun
What was the intensity of CAD in January 2005 ?1037 is very intense for a CAD high, getting close to rivaling Dec 2002 in terms of parent high intensity
High needs to press further south but you are seeing ensemble members that have the northern midlands and northern suburbs in on the ice potential and there’s still plenty of time for changes to happen.so how can I get this down to Columbia? ?