Webberweather53
Meteorologist
Not really, storms missed you today, other areas reported golf ball size hail and several mid level rotating mesocyclones, and damaging wind gustsAnd once again the storms are less severe when we're under a watch versus when we aren't.
Not really, storms missed you today, other areas reported golf ball size hail and several mid level rotating mesocyclones, and damaging wind gusts
NOT EVERYONE IN THE WATCH WILL SEE SEVERE WEATHER!!!!!! IT MEANS CONDITIONS ARE FAVORABLE IN THE WATCH AREA IF A STORM GETS GOINGAnd once again the storms are less severe when we're under a watch versus when we aren't.
I know that. My point has always been the storms around here the past few years end up being more severe when not under a watch versus when we are under a watch. I am talking specifically for Wake. The tornadoes we had earlier this month happened when we were not under a watch. It's been like that here the past few years.NOT EVERYONE IN THE WATCH WILL SEE SEVERE WEATHER!!!!!! IT MEANS CONDITIONS ARE FAVORABLE IN THE WATCH AREA IF A STORM GETS GOING
THEY COULD HAVE BEEN A "SHORT" STORM SAY SOMEWHERE AROUND 7-8,000 FT INSTEAD OF THE MORE USUAL ONES THAT ARE 30,000 FEET AND NOT DETECTED BY RADAR SO THERE FOR NO WATCH NOR WARNINGI know that. My point has always been the storms around here the past few years end up being more severe when not under a watch versus when we are under a watch. I am talking specifically for Wake. The tornadoes we had earlier this month happened when we were not under a watch. It's been like that here the past few years.
I know that. My point has always been the storms around here the past few years end up being more severe when not under a watch versus when we are under a watch. I am talking specifically for Wake. The tornadoes we had earlier this month happened when we were not under a watch. It's been like that here the past few years.
You can't narrow this kind of analysis down to one county and arrive at a meaningful conclusion. A watch covers a large area. At the very least, if you're going to develop a generalization, you need to generalize over the entire CWA.I know that. My point has always been the storms around here the past few years end up being more severe when not under a watch versus when we are under a watch. I am talking specifically for Wake. The tornadoes we had earlier this month happened when we were not under a watch. It's been like that here the past few years.
Sounds like you are complaining. The next time you are under a TOR/STS watch, might just make up for the times you missed out. In the end, the likelihood is greater over a larger area when you are under a watch. You have been lucky so far. Be thankful.I know that. My point has always been the storms around here the past few years end up being more severe when not under a watch versus when we are under a watch. I am talking specifically for Wake. The tornadoes we had earlier this month happened when we were not under a watch. It's been like that here the past few years.
I was talking about that earlier, definitely a run that made you think a bit, and now plus you got typical summertime instability unless there’s a lot of Convective debrisThe Euro is very interesting for this next weekend. Its not too common to deal with the chance of supercells and tornadoes in the south in June outside of tropical systems.
ACCORDING TO NWS BMX THERE IS A VERY VERY VERY LOW CHANCE FOR ANY SEVERE WEATHER. I WAS TOLD IT WILL BE A RAIN MAKERThe Euro is very interesting for this next weekend. Its not too common to deal with the chance of supercells and tornadoes in the south in June outside of tropical systems.