But Brad Says Nope. These guys are funny as He!!CJ starting the season aggressive. Full court press View attachment 176872
5 second penalty, turnoverCJ starting the season aggressive. Full court press View attachment 176872
As others have mentioned, Allan is pretty levelheaded. I've seen him in the past post stuff showing higher chances of warmth. So, this post is great news for us weather nerds.Allan has some great insights on his Patreon page if y’all are not following him already…
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, But this certainly changes my expectations from just a couple of days ago. That looked pretty disappointing for our December to remember... lolGood video. And I mean he's right. The ridge risk is there & the overnight weeklies really showed it's ugly head with it. I do wonder how everything adjust to the favorable MJO progression.
Yep, But this certainly changes my expectations from just a couple of days ago. That looked pretty disappointing for our December to remember... lol
Yep, But this certainly changes my expectations from just a couple of days ago. That looked pretty disappointing for our December to remember... lol
I couldn’t agree more. This is IMO why I look more at indicies in the long range as opposed to model output. Right now we see both the AO and NAO looking to go back negative after a couple days slightly positive. The PNA, slightly negative right now is already showing signs of going positive just after the first of month. Finally, the MJO while in phase 7, looks to be moving steadily into Phase 8.I think we're outside of the ensemble range, and the weeklies honestly are terrible IMO. I believe it's a complete unknown what comes to pass mid December. BAM was all for cold explosion last week, now they're not. Same as all of us.
I'd like the weeklies to show phase 8/+PNA, and for the jet and the Alaskan ridge to push east, pushing the SE ridge out, but it's not doing it right now on the models, but that doesn't mean it won't. Just all options on the table at the moment for mid Dec. I think if we wait, and phase 8 gets into ensemble range, the models will hopefully correct and start showing cold air getting to us. I'm trying to have patience, but at the same time not get my hopes up.
This model definitely sucks! Que Snizzle in 5,4,3…….View attachment 176963View attachment 176964
Yes sir! I just find the snow holes on the maps and the totals are amusing! It’s just fun to look at, and the accuracy of my wooly worm!Hey Mack,
I know that you know that the extended portions of control runs are of very little value.
Yes sir! I just find the snow holes on the maps and the totals are amusing! It’s just fun to look at, and the accuracy of my wooly worm!
That Carolina snow hole will probably be the area that gets the most snow compared to average this winter. Wouldn't that be ironic.This model definitely sucks! Que Snizzle in 5,4,3…….View attachment 176963
I remember Springfield MO getting some really bad ice storms (and great snows) in the past because I used to service an account there. You would think if they can get drilled with winter weather, certainly Tulsa can.Don't get me wrong it's probably going to snow at some point(it's been over 100 years since we didn't measure in a winter so I'm not exactly worried about it right now)... But most years we struggle to get over 6 inches at once is my pointit's a lot of 1-3 inch storms usually which isn't enough to shut us down and stop everything I think is the issue and why people are never happy but the unrealistic expectations here are just insane. I mean they've lived here longer than I have and I know the late 2010s had some absolutely embarrassing winters here
Springfield is further north and a good bit higher in elevation !I remember Springfield MO getting some really bad ice storms (and great snows) in the past because I used to service an account there. You would think if they can get drilled with winter weather, certainly Tulsa can.
I remember Springfield MO getting some really bad ice storms (and great snows) in the past because I used to service an account there. You would think if they can get drilled with winter weather, certainly Tulsa can.
We have not had a below normal Dec in 12 years!We've had three storms over 6 inches this decade already... If you take out the snow hole in 23 and 24 it really hasn't been that bad I guess
And yeah we had a big ice storm in 2007
But the last part of the 2010s had 3 or 4 winters in a row not even measure more than 2 inches the whole winter. It must have been horrible
Jan-Feb have always been the snowiest/coldest months here in the SE. I get wanting cold early and can appreciate it but it doesn’t match up to averages. Some say it has to happen early now or it won’t happen but I thought we were going to a neutral state. I get your no longer living in the SE also!We have not had a below normal Dec in 12 years!![]()
The longer this holds off until later in Dec the better. If it is to cycle. We just aren't climo until at least the SolsticeJan-Feb have always been the snowiest/coldest months here in the SE. I get wanting cold early and can appreciate it but it doesn’t match up to averages. Some say it has to happen early now or it won’t happen but I thought we were going to a neutral state. I get your no longer living in the SE also!
Yeah cold weather on December is such a waste anyways …. January February right timeJan-Feb have always been the snowiest/coldest months here in the SE. I get wanting cold early and can appreciate it but it doesn’t match up to averages. Some say it has to happen early now or it won’t happen but I thought we were going to a neutral state. I get your no longer living in the SE also!
I think we will take what we can get , when we can get it but I know the past few years the December cold has been real cold and led to suppression. I would love to see a 2000 Jan-Feb snow storm, I’d even settle for a 2010 Christmas event !The longer this holds off until later in Dec the better. If it is to cycle. We just aren't climo until at least the Solstice
Yeah that was a good Tweet.![]()
Not surprisingly the boreal polar vortex has collapsed
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah that was a good Tweet.
We'll see how long it stays down.



Thank you! The GFS is already showing a return of the block. But it IS the GFS OP, after all.By the way, screw the bias corrected Euro MJO plot. If they want to bias correct it, they need to be adding amplitude, not reducing it on these diagrams given how it normally behaves.
Anyway, the GEFS and Euro seem to have a consistent idea here of pushing the MJO east out of the MC/W Pac, then after the initial surge east, there is renewed convection in the W Pacific (Phase 7), before a secondary push out into what I believe will be Phase 8-1-2. The GEFS is the slowest of the models with that progression, and it often does a pretty good job with that.
View attachment 177276
View attachment 177277
Here on the Euro plots you can see this progression with the push east, then the slowdown and renewed convective signal in the W Pac in the 3rd image, before a renewed progression to the east (images are from late Nov to late Dec).
View attachment 177278
Here are Paul Roundy's thoughts (on X) on the MJO progression thru December (seems pretty typical with a sizable MJO waving moving east during a La Nina):
"The signal is presently being controlled by superposition of a slow eastward-moving signal now entering the West Pacific, and a fast signal superimposed on it that results in loops out and in along the trajectory in RMM space. The low frequency part will contribute toward a very slow progression through phases 6, 7, 8, 1, and possibly 2, but the faster signal superimposed will lead the index to surge outward to high amplitude, then back toward the center, then out again. The biggest wildcards regard the faster signal superimposed on the slow one. If they're strong enough, they could cause the signal to move into the circle, then surge outward again toward high amplitude. It's likely that the last week of December will be in phases 8-1."
So, overall, the good news is that this is a slow moving MJO wave that is getting out of the Maritime Continent and Western Pacific, but with complex interactions that are causing the loop de loops. In the end, I believe it will be a net positive for the pattern as we go thru the second half of Dec into early Jan.
After this first week of Dec, I still believe there will be some jet retraction due to -EAMT-like conditions with low pressure running thru E Asia, but we'll see as SE ridging is losing that battle here in early Dec.
But thereafter, hopefully the MJO progression combined with what should be improving conditions in E Asia with the EAMT situation should help to extend the Pac jet more and get us into improving western ridging.
Blocking is always hard to predict, so we'll have to see on that, but I think there's more reason than not to believe we see some renewed blocking in mid to late Dec.
That small area of renewed convection looks like a Kelvin wave, which is what’s probably messing with the RMM chartsBy the way, screw the bias corrected Euro MJO plot. If they want to bias correct it, they need to be adding amplitude, not reducing it on these diagrams given how it normally behaves.
Anyway, the GEFS and Euro seem to have a consistent idea here of pushing the MJO east out of the MC/W Pac, then after the initial surge east, there is renewed convection in the W Pacific (Phase 7), before a secondary push out into what I believe will be Phase 8-1-2. The GEFS is the slowest of the models with that progression, and it often does a pretty good job with that.
View attachment 177276
View attachment 177277
Here on the Euro plots you can see this progression with the push east, then the slowdown and renewed convective signal in the W Pac in the 3rd image, before a renewed progression to the east (images are from late Nov to late Dec).
View attachment 177278
Here are Paul Roundy's thoughts (on X) on the MJO progression thru December (seems pretty typical with a sizable MJO wave moving east during a La Nina):
"The signal is presently being controlled by superposition of a slow eastward-moving signal now entering the West Pacific, and a fast signal superimposed on it that results in loops out and in along the trajectory in RMM space. The low frequency part will contribute toward a very slow progression through phases 6, 7, 8, 1, and possibly 2, but the faster signal superimposed will lead the index to surge outward to high amplitude, then back toward the center, then out again. The biggest wildcards regard the faster signal superimposed on the slow one. If they're strong enough, they could cause the signal to move into the circle, then surge outward again toward high amplitude. It's likely that the last week of December will be in phases 8-1."
So, overall, the good news is that this is a slow moving MJO wave that is getting out of the Maritime Continent and Western Pacific, but with complex interactions that are causing the loop de loops. In the end, I believe it will be a net positive for the pattern as we go thru the second half of Dec into early Jan.
After this first week of Dec, I still believe there will be some jet retraction due to -EAMT-like conditions with low pressure running thru E Asia, but we'll see as SE ridging is losing that battle here in early Dec.
But thereafter, hopefully the MJO progression combined with what should be improving conditions in E Asia with the EAMT situation should help to extend the Pac jet more and get us into improving western ridging.
Blocking is always hard to predict, so we'll have to see on that, but I think there's more reason than not to believe we see some renewed blocking in mid to late Dec.
Yeah and seems pretty common in these progressions where the MJO is trying to come out of the MCThat small area of renewed convection looks like a Kelvin wave, which is what’s probably messing with the RMM charts