There was the Iran Deal done during the Obama Admin. that was in effect and had Iran’s nuclear weapons development constrained until DT had the US withdraw from it in 2018, likely due to his hate for Obama. These latest talks were trying to essentially get back to those constraints. Oh well.
-
Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!
Misc This Means WAR
- Thread starter Rain Cold
- Start date
There was the Iran Deal done during the Obama Admin. that was in effect and had Iran’s nuclear weapons development constrained until DT had the US withdraw from it in 2018, likely due to his hate for Obama. These latest talks were trying to essentially get back to those constraints. Oh well.
JHS
Member
It certainly does not. Now we will see if Trump resumes the war. Based on what Vance has recently said he will be resuming it.
JHS
Member
Now we will get to see if Trump puts ground troops in or goes after the infrastructure like has threatened to do. I think the idea of nothing special happening is over. Iran will certainly not be opening the strait anytime soon. This is going to get REALLY ugly now unless we get a miracle.
Vance has left Pakistan so no more talks at that level will be happening.
Vance has left Pakistan so no more talks at that level will be happening.
JHS
Member
I don't think Trump has a choice now. He has to resume the war and pummel Iran and hope for the best.
JHS
Member
Not correct. The strait stays closed, the regime survives, and Iran gets nukes before too long.
GeorgiaGirl
Member
I think that's not going to need to be a major worry for now at least and I would personally still favor that China still works on reunification non-militarily.
But I will say that if I'm going to be incorrect in the relative short-term (though it's more medium term), I think you'll start seeing more ship buildup in the south China sea in roughly probably about 24 months from here, I would figure.
It’s just a break per this:
Two Pakistani officials said discussions between the heads of the delegations will resume after a break. Some technical personnel from both teams are still meeting, said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to brief the press.
www.yahoo.com
Two Pakistani officials said discussions between the heads of the delegations will resume after a break. Some technical personnel from both teams are still meeting, said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to brief the press.
US Vice President JD Vance says talks with Iran ended after 21 hours without reaching agreement
U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance said negotiations ended early Sunday between the United States and Iran without a peace deal after the Iranians refused to accept American terms to not develop a nuclear...
The Trump card the president holds if Iran won’t bend: a naval blockade: justthenews.com/government/sec
Its rather odd. So many twitter posts but no one wants to repost the 14 posts Trump posted on Truth Social in the last 24 hours here. Other than the one GaWx linked.
VegasEagle
Member
One of the main arguments used against the JCPOA was that it allowed Iran to continue enriching uranium and move closer to nuclear capability while remaining technically in compliance. The JCPOA also contained so-called “sunset provisions” on various aspects of the deal such as lifting limits on centrifuges after 10 years or reduced enrichment beyond 3.67% only lasting for 15 years.