let’s go brother!Good lord, look at the back side action on the ukmet... Hope it's on to something.
@Mitch West ehh?
View attachment 170317
let’s go brother!Good lord, look at the back side action on the ukmet... Hope it's on to something.
@Mitch West ehh?
View attachment 170317
And in exchange an expansive sleet stormHonestly looks like NAM actually backed off a little on the warm nose
my understanding is that it has an effect when the convection is aligned generally perpendicular to the flow. honestly on reflection this isn't a "perfect" example but notice the convection is parallel to the coast. you want convection to be generally aligned with the typical SW flow coming off the gulf, which typically helps. What you risk in this case is storms remaining stationary over the gulf, forming a MCS, a cold pool, their own mesolow even... i don't think it's a death knell it just saps resources like a sucker stem on a tomato plant. and in this model depiction it may be why the foothills/upstate are so dryDoes this only have an affect when the LP is in the Gulf (Western areas) or would it also affect the system's future development as it is starting to crank off the SE coast (Eastern areas) or both in general?
Like someone said yesterday.... dont sleep on sleet. You get 3-4" Snow and put an inch of sleet on it and coating of ICE its gonna hang around. My little 1.5 Inch SN/IP from Jan event legit hung tough for 5-6 days in shadeAnd in exchange an expansive sleet storm
Sent from my A600DL using Tapatalk
you sure?Honestly looks like NAM actually backed off a little on the warm nose
It’s crazy how this almost always works.I think the 09z SREF plumes might be the wettest yet for RDU. Would not at all be surprised to see the 12z NAM increase QPF (and perhaps warmth).
We got pretty close to wet snow sounding here all through the NAM. 36 degrees at the surface with heavy snow through 900 makes no sense to stay at that.The soundings on the 12z NAM over CLT where there is ZR seem to be really close to sleet/wet snow soundings imo.
What do you think? @Myfrotho704_
I like the NAM it’s more accurate than the HRRRIt’s crazy how this almost always works.
RAH might be rethinking the WWAs after that run. Even with mixing, that is nearing QPF bomb territory so it’s a very high impact event. Of course, it’s the NAM so maybe we disregard.
Yeah, it's close to keeping Durham all snow. Had sleet on the VA border 6z. 3km looks amazing tooyou sure?
I know @griteater did a nice write up in here about soundings, thermals, snow/sleet/zr with temps through the column. IIRC even though this sounding shows sleet, seems most dendrites would make it to the surface and would still be mostly snow. Am I wrong about that? or just wishful thinking? Lol
View attachment 170332
Different type of storm but 12/17 showed me what wins with a column like that.We got pretty close to wet snow sounding here all through the NAM. 36 degrees at the surface with heavy snow through 900 makes no sense to stay at that.
Yeah I disregarded the snownado potential LolThere is a ton of warm advection in that sounding, that hodograph is lol.
4" of sleet would be awesome...would be an ice skating rink outside and great sledding for the kids.@SD gets 4" of sleet this run
Yeah 3k NAM a lot snowier then the NAM, hopefully it's higher resolution is better and more accurate.3km and GFS still lining up for the most part. I still think heavier precip verifies more NW...it always does.
View attachment 170335
Theoretically, yes. In this system, there are bigger dynamics at play also though including strong upper level divergence due to being in the right entrance region of a ~200 kt jet streak favorably positioned over the Mid-Atlantic, especially in northeastern NC / southeastern VA.
I mean SREF has done the same thing so I am not that surprised