Yep I mean its easy to see warming in the means, snow totals, lack of record lows over the last 2-3 decades. What really gets to me is the way the narrative has been built that every event is GW related and every statement has a fail safe well but that's GW too built in.People who don't believe the world is going to burst into flames or get swallowed up by oceans in 12 years are not "deniers". People who legitimately question the data for a relatively short period of time (since records have been kept, 1860'ish) compared to nonexistent observations from previous centuries, also not "deniers". Those that state we are in a warmer climate but question whether it's cyclical (which we really don't know) or if it's AGW or not, also not "deniers".