lexxnchloe
Member
-
Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!
Misc This Means WAR
- Thread starter Rain Cold
- Start date
The news is quoting Verbatim what he said I'm surprised they could even quote that on news TV
Last edited:
Of many of the things that Trump has ever said I'd probably say that fact is most likely a lie.
lexxnchloe
Member
A tiny price for the return of a hero. How humilating it must be for the Jew butchers that they couldnt even stop a landing and rescue deep inside Iran.
lexxnchloe
Member
When you want the terror animals in Iran to listen, you talk language they understand. I should post Pattons speech to the troops but it would get me banned. However, if anyone wants me to do so, i will, unredacted
Pretty sure Israel attacked Iran
JHS
Member
I just found this and am listening to it. He would be fired instantly for saying anything close to this today.
I think I read that the mass grave was two C130s which were purposely destroyed when they left.
this photo is ai generated.
Sun evening opens: crude, which had closed at 111+ on Thu, was as high as 115 last hour. It’s now 113+.
Stock market indices are down 0.6%.
Though not pretty, I actually thought they both might be even worse. A long week of trading is ahead.
Stock market indices are down 0.6%.
Though not pretty, I actually thought they both might be even worse. A long week of trading is ahead.
lexxnchloe
Member
DCK
Member
Did we not rescue a soldier behind enemy lines when said country was hunting for him? Would we let a pilot from another country be rescued? Humiliating is a stretch.
Well, yeah...
DCK
Member
And that is more humiliating than offering a $$ reward for a serviceman shot down in your country, rushing to find him, only to have the other side rescue said serviceman? How is that not humiliating for Iran?
Agreed
GeorgiaGirl
Member
It's probably bad that I've gotten to this point, but I've gotten to where I chuckle every time I see this truth post.
Praising Allah on Easter?
I got an update from my Iranian-American friend today:
1. He and many Iranian-Americans are hoping that Trump doesn’t go through with his threats to take out power and especially water desalination. If these things are done, they would violate international law obviously and innocent Iranians, especially poor and unhealthy ones, would die whereas the mullahs would be ok due to them having their own source of drinking water. So, they wouldn’t budge as they’re evil and don’t care about the citizens.
Furthermore, Iran would then probably do the same to the Gulf states causing an even bigger mess. Also, Iran would get increased international support from countries like China and Russia. My friend is rather worried.
2. Instead, they’d prefer US/Israel concentrate on killing regime members and go after military targets, rather than civilian infrastructure, if war’s to continue.
3. He and other Iranians/Iranian Americans were at first optimistic about the possibility of regime change after the ayatollah was killed. But then after his and other killings and the ruthless regime remained intact, they then realized that the regime is more entrenched/deeper than they ever thought. Thus they then lost almost all hope for regime change. They still hate the regime!
4. Iran has 50 states like the U.S. Each state is ruled by evil mullahs. That would mean somehow being able to remove the national mullah regime from power (doubtful) would still leave the 50 states!
5. He’s not optimistic about the mullahs giving up much of anything in peace talks, including opening up the Strait to like it was before. During the last two peace talks, they were still attacked and that hurts the prospects. Plus the mullahs aren’t concerned if the war continues as they now feel safe. A good # were killed earlier due to the war then being a surprise. Now they’re hiding.
6. They have no idea whether or not the ayatollah’s son is alive. He thinks that it oddly enough may be to the mullahs advantage if he’s dead because they could continue to pretend he isn’t without people knowing. If he were alive, he could then be killed and the US/Israel declare that a victory.
7. US/Israel should have attacked in January (as @lexxnchloe said), they would have then had a legit reason per the rest of the world and thus much more outside support.
8. He doesn’t see the citizens trying to protest again after 30K+ were murdered. Also, they’d have little chance to successfully revolt due to having no guns. He wishes Iranians were armed like is the case here. Thus he has a newfound respect for the 2nd Amendment despite not owning a gun.
1. He and many Iranian-Americans are hoping that Trump doesn’t go through with his threats to take out power and especially water desalination. If these things are done, they would violate international law obviously and innocent Iranians, especially poor and unhealthy ones, would die whereas the mullahs would be ok due to them having their own source of drinking water. So, they wouldn’t budge as they’re evil and don’t care about the citizens.
Furthermore, Iran would then probably do the same to the Gulf states causing an even bigger mess. Also, Iran would get increased international support from countries like China and Russia. My friend is rather worried.
2. Instead, they’d prefer US/Israel concentrate on killing regime members and go after military targets, rather than civilian infrastructure, if war’s to continue.
3. He and other Iranians/Iranian Americans were at first optimistic about the possibility of regime change after the ayatollah was killed. But then after his and other killings and the ruthless regime remained intact, they then realized that the regime is more entrenched/deeper than they ever thought. Thus they then lost almost all hope for regime change. They still hate the regime!
4. Iran has 50 states like the U.S. Each state is ruled by evil mullahs. That would mean somehow being able to remove the national mullah regime from power (doubtful) would still leave the 50 states!
5. He’s not optimistic about the mullahs giving up much of anything in peace talks, including opening up the Strait to like it was before. During the last two peace talks, they were still attacked and that hurts the prospects. Plus the mullahs aren’t concerned if the war continues as they now feel safe. A good # were killed earlier due to the war then being a surprise. Now they’re hiding.
6. They have no idea whether or not the ayatollah’s son is alive. He thinks that it oddly enough may be to the mullahs advantage if he’s dead because they could continue to pretend he isn’t without people knowing. If he were alive, he could then be killed and the US/Israel declare that a victory.
7. US/Israel should have attacked in January (as @lexxnchloe said), they would have then had a legit reason per the rest of the world and thus much more outside support.
8. He doesn’t see the citizens trying to protest again after 30K+ were murdered. Also, they’d have little chance to successfully revolt due to having no guns. He wishes Iranians were armed like is the case here. Thus he has a newfound respect for the 2nd Amendment despite not owning a gun.
Last edited:
I forgot one more thing from my friend: Even if the citizens were given guns, it’s not that easy because it would still take time for them to be able to use them effectively in revolt due to needing training.
lexxnchloe
Member
It gets down to the best thing to do is take Kharg and control Irans economy. We can collect the 2 million per ship and charge any ship going to the EU 10 million.
lexxnchloe
Member
The Iranian people still need to be prepared to be stabbed in the back by Trump. Even after humiliating the IRGC with the rescue stupid Trump is still doing his damn best to negotiate away victory. At this point a ceasefire before total surrender makes Trump a lunatic fool. We all know 45 days will turn into 45 weeks and Iran will just re-arm and execute thousands more. The Iranian govts biggest ally right now is Trumps's stupidity
But the mullahs doing a total surrender isn’t realistic as per the post I just made based on my friend’s comments.
lexxnchloe
Member
Surrender? They won.
Has either side clearly won at this stage? I don’t think so.
lexxnchloe
Member
You should tell your friend to advise the Iranian people to prepare for 10 times the repression now. The regime is going to be executing thousands who they think collaborated with us. An Iron curtain of death will descend over the people who wanted freedom from the Mullahs
lexxnchloe
Member
Regime survival is total victory. Dont you thing the Nazi's in Nov of 1944 would have breathed a sigh of relief had Roosevelt and Stalin had decided to end the war thru negotiation?
lexxnchloe
Member
Wars arent won with the preeminent concern being how much wealth the stock market lost.
WW2 was won by many factors. But in regards to the US, it involved a rapidly rebounding US stock market. A healthy international coalition of allies, and overwhelming domestic support for the war effort.
We are lacking on all of those factors at the moment.
lexxnchloe
Member
The world now is rapidly becoming Islamicized, especially the EU. The people who wanted the Mullahs dead and defeated most are the ones who know them best. The Gulf states and the majority of the Iranain people.
Iran is humiliating the US military? We may not "win" in a Iran given the objectives may be impossible to reach, but they've barely killed any of our people while we've killed thousands of theirs. Not sure how that tracks.